Scottish clubs’ fan ownership: A model for more EFL sides to follow?

As the possession troubles involving Bolton and Bury continue, Sky Sports News assesses the versions adopted by some clubs.
Bury were expelled in Sky Bet League One using the EFL after C&N Sporting Risk.
With the EFL well ready to talk about their readmission to the Football League, Gary Neville, who has close links with Bury urged Shakers fans secure the future of their club and to take control.
Bury’s two MPs, Manchester Mayor Andy Burnham and supporters society Bury are also part.
Meanwhile, the Bolton were on the point of liquidation week before Football Ventures’ takeover has been confirmed.
The team needed to secure their future or risk expulsion.
In 2016, Motherwell turned into a fan-owned Scottish Premiership side together with the Well Society supporters group.
St Mirren were taken over before the exact same year, after a bid from their manager Gordon Scott along with the St Mirren Independent Supporters Association.
They are just two examples of sway and enthusiast ownership at Scottish soccer clubs, Stirling Albion would be the very first British club to achieve 100 percent fan ownership in 2010 when the Stirling Albion Supporters Trust took over.
Clyde and East Stirlingshire have similar structures, although Dunfermline Athletic were saved from government and potential oblivion in 2013 from the Pars Trust. Annan Athletic appeared to become at 2017.
The theory has also been adopted by two Scottish footballing giants.
Heart of Midlothian were discharged from government in 2014 by businesswoman Ann Budge.
Year Budge is scheduled to hand her shareholding over to the fans’ group Foundation of Hearts, which will make Hearts the football club in the united kingdom.
Budge will stay on for at least a year to guarantee a smooth transition, from which point fans will call the shots.
The landscape has shifted in Easter Road recently, although in 2015, Hibernian announced strategies Around Edinburgh to give their fans the opportunity to have at least 51 percent of club stocks.
Majority shareholder Tom Farmer was bought out by US businessman Ron Gordon during the summertime, but fans currently own around a third of shares in Hibernian.
A fresh Partick Thistle fans team have started their effort to take control of the Scottish Championship club amid concerns over a possible takeover, this week.
Thistle For Ever say they aim to secure a majority shareholding for fans of the Firhill facet because of speculation about a potential sale to a consortium”without any connections to this club or its community”.
Supporters groups currently have nearly 27 percent of the club’s stocks, and this campaign is looking to put in a further 24 per cent, by making an offer to all present shareholders to sell to their fans.
The move comes after EuroMillions lotto winner Colin Weir withdrew his financial support to the club and academy following boardroom changes, while speculation is rife that the proprietors of Barnsley are currently negotiating to purchase Thistle.
Sky Sports News spoke to members of Motherwell Partick Thistle and St Mirren’s supporters bands, to contrast and compare their thoughts on possession.
It is the heart and soul of why you are involved with soccer; all you need is the very most appropriate for your club.
I believe we are concerned (roughly Patrick Thistle’s potential ). Two months ago, we had been told about a bargain coming to the table which has been transformational for your club, however, no details have surfaced.
We’ve gone from a situation in which we had a benefactor leading much to the team (lottery winner Chris Weir, that has since walked away), without any debt, to now a place of uncertainty.
We own almost 30 per cent of the club. We provide you an alternative to them that may take the club Whether this group of supervisors are genuine Partick Thistle investors.
We’re debt-free. We should be playing in our means.
I think fan possession is we’ve seen it right up to clubs that the dimensions of Hearts, it functions. You have got to think about who is in charge, although I believe it could be adopted.
Our hearts go out to them in Bolton and Bury. It has got to come out of your fans, find the community together and also they will need to galvanise themselves; it happened previously at Exeter City and Wimbledon which were unbelievably difficult circumstances in England.
Experience and the wisdom is there to do it wasn’t ten to fifteen decades ago.
What worked (at Motherwell) has been having control. The trick to everything at football clubs is control. We had help from Les Hutchison in securing the club, and then the problem was that worked, and we needed to cover Les back.
The Motherwell academy has performed well, it’s a blueprint for Scottish football in general. You just have to look there which have brought income.
This season, we have assembled a strong squad that we haven’t been able to do before. A good deal of those lads performed well and stepped up for it and have come in.
Within all that, Motherwell is a community center. I received my newsletter in the other afternoon, telling me just how much I have put to the club, asking for contributions and ideas… you’re part of it.
I think that is what fans want, they do not wish to be on the exterior being stressed if somebody is going to come in with big bucks to spare their bar, like Bury or Bolton.
The first hurdle is belief. Paul Goodwin and I were in a Motherwell match and we were speaking to people there, that were routine Motherwell fans.
They were people who fiscally could manage to contribute to the Well Society and the clubbut once we spoke to them said,”Oh, so that’s a bit pie in the sky.”
They didn’t really believe that the lovers could grow in influence and possession and buy up shares from the bar. You have got a state at the club, although you might not have the club, Actually if it inching percentage by percent. I think that is essential.
Getting people to think things could change, and getting people to think that’s possible, it’s a big hurdle. It amazed me how their feet were shuffling and wouldn’t do anything.
We had an owner (former chairman Stewart Gilmour) who had wished to market up for quite a while, and there wasn’t any real prospect of anyone coming – no bright knight in armour!
The fans put their money together and found somebody who’d take that obligation (present chairman Gordon Scott) and then pay back that money.
There was that doubt there, you did not understand who was going to come along and try to obtain the club. We’ve seen lots of folks buy clubs, come together and desert them after months or years in charge.
Possessing that possession gives you that sort of certainty instead of anything else.
Fan ownership in itself is new. Some people today believe they have more control because of their investment.
It goes to you and just that sense that this is a company, it’s a neighborhood now, that’s the thing that’s definitely worked.
The ones that are not companies, these clubs, do not really have much more of an alternative. All these are neighborhood clubs; Bury was never likely to be in Europe.
St Mirren aren’t ever likely to be in Europe, we’ve got those fantasies… but they are about the lovers and that area. Nobody is likely to make money.
It seems almost common belief why aren’t they owned by the community, that since those nightclubs are on the community and from the city?

Read more here: http://news.modernfa.com/?p=5819

مطالب پیشنهادی

درباره نویسنده

5987 مطلب نوشته است.

تمام حقوق این سایت برای © 2020 پایگاه خبری مدرن فا. محفوظ است.
قدرت گرفته از خبرساز چند زبانه موج مجازی